Sunday, 6 May 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 175: What's It All About
So far in this 1960 section of the challenge we've primarily focused on big, colourful musicals without much comment about life was like in the sixties. However the British were making films which today almost feel like a time capsule this is especially true of Alfie which perfectly documents the swinging sixties. Our titular lead is of course played by Michael Caine and is the consummate ladies' man who is constantly breaking the fourth wall to tell his rules about not wanting to string women along. Though on the surface Alfie is a smooth-talker underneath he is as emotional as the rest of us and throughout the film he learns lots of life lessons. He becomes a father however the mother of his son chooses a more dependable father figure, he is sent to a rest home after the doctor finds a shadow on his lung and he also forces one of his married lovers to have an abortion in what is probably the film's most shocking scene. The film comes full circle as he rejected by the much older Ruby, played with gusto by Shelly Winters, when he discovers she has a new lover who is younger than he is. The end line is the one most associated with the film as the character asks us 'What's it All About?' followed by the title theme sung by either Cher or Cilla Black depending on which version you watched.
Alfie is certainly an unusual film as far as the 1960s go as the character is constantly addressing the audience and also there are no title credits as Caine tells us 'this is where you'd expect the titles to be' instead we have an elaborate end credit sequence featuring pictures of both cast and crew members. I have to say the character of Alfie did take a while to settle into because at the end of the day he is a bit of an ass and treats women as objects often referring to them as 'it'. However Caine is such a charismatic presence that he is able to carry this off for the most part especially in the more dramatic moments when Alfie has a breakdown or sees the aborted foetus of his married lover. Otto Heller's cinematography shows a bustling London where everybody is dressed smartly however director Lewis Gilbert combines this with an underbelly of backstreet terminations and pub brawls. I feel that Alfie is a much different film than the ones we've watched before, especially those that have been tasked with presenting Britain in a certain way, and I have to say it is refreshing to see a film that is so brutally honest in a presenting a character who isn't totally likeable. Overall a unique film with a superb lead performance, some stunning cinematography and a cracking end credits sequence.
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 174: And then Some Audrey
So here it is the first Oscar Challenge post on this brand new blog in which I continue my quest to watch every film nominated for Best Picture which I think has a projected finish date of 2015. To start this new site off we present another double bill of one person's efforts in the decade and this time we focus on the delicate features of Miss Audrey Hepburn.
Despite being nominated for five Best Actress Oscars only two of those films were nominated for Best Picture one being Roman Holiday which we looked at last decade and the other being The Nun's Story. Hepburn plays Gabrielle Van Der Mal the daughter of a brilliant doctor who herself dreams of being a medical professional and decides to become a nun so that she can work in one of the hospitals in the Congo. The first hour of the film is devoted to her becoming a nun, later known as Sister Luke, including her taking orders as well as learning her vows which means she can no longer have memories or want physical things. When it finally comes to time to take her medical exams her mother superior suggest that she fail her exam in order to show humility however when she passes she is assigned to a mental hospital in her native Belgium rather than her preferred destination of the Congo. Finally she is allowed to go to Africa where she works with Peter Finch's brilliant atheist Dr Fucani who tries to get her to open up but her vows won't allow it. While in the Congo she sees the dangers of the country when one of the other nun's is killed by a villager and she is later transported back to Belgium after she contracts TB. Missing her life in the Congo she is called to be a nurse again when she has to treat casualties hurt in the bombing of World War 2 however her feelings towards the Nazi Party make her think that she can be a nun no longer especially when she finds out her father has been killed. The film ends with Gabrielle denouncing her orders and leaving the convent once and for all her experiences their having made her a better person.
As I mentioned the first hour of The Nun's Story is almost exclusively reserved for Gabrielle's transformation into Sister Luke including watching her during dinner and during mass. As you can imagine this is pretty dull at times however it does make you relate to the characters and also what it takes to become a nun in the first place. The film really picks up in when Sister Luke makes it to the Congo partly due to the on-location filming that really makes you feel like you're there with the characters and partly because of Peter Finch. This is the first time we're seeing Finch as part of the Oscar Challenge, it won't be the last, and he makes Fucani his own being very forthright but at the same time you can see he cares about Sister Luke whether that be in a romantic way or just friendly concern is a matter we have to decide for ourselves. What makes The Nun's Story so great though is Hepburn herself who at times is the only reason to keep watching throughout you can really believe her as this young girl forced to leave behind everything she knows to give herself wholly to God. I feel she is better here than in her Oscar-winning turn in Roman Holiday partly because this film is heavier meaning the role has more gravitas and partly because it is a more mature performance. Overall this was a film of two halves one a semi-documentary on how nuns are welcomed into a convent and the other a medical film set in Africa coupled with a World War II movie. Thankfully Audrey Hepburn is the star that makes the most of her role and therefore this film is a lot better for having her be a part of it.
I'm not sure the same can be said for My Fair Lady, at least not all of it, which was the film that won Best Picture at the 1965 Oscar Ceremony. Most of us know the story of Professor Henry Higgins taking flower girl Eliza Dolittle off the street and making a bet with his friend Colonel Pickering that he pass her off as a lady at the next embassy ball. The film deals with their relationship as Eliza develops into a lady with Higgins winning his bet and in turn her being pursued by Freddy Eynsford-Hill a boy of breeding who is charmed by her frank nature. However Eliza has fallen for Higgins and runs away from him after he fails to thank her for winning his bet but at the end of the day she returns to him so we the viewer have to decide what happens next. For me this was Rex Harrison's film rather than Hepburn's his blustering, domineering Higgins is a joy to watch mainly because Harrison makes this brute of a man somewhat sympathetic. For me Hepburn struggles with the earlier segments in which she has to play at being a rough cockney flower-seller and personally I never bought her verbal attacks against Higgins finding them forced at times. Hepburn is better in the latter half of the film after she has almost been transformed into a lady her scenes at the races and the embassy ball being my favourite. Stanley Holloway is also great as Eliza's money-grabbing father as is Gladys Cooper as Higgins' disapproving mother. What's so great about My Fair Lady though is how it looks and how it sounds with the production design splendid, the costumes fantastic and the songs being memorable. This musical boasts some of the most famous songs from the theatre including 'I Could've Danced All Night', 'I've Grown Accustomed to Her Face', 'Get Me to the Church on Time' and my personal favourite 'On the Street Where You Live.' Like with Oliver! and The Sound of Music I'm still not convinced that an old-school musical like this should've won a Best Picture prize but again I will reserve judgment until I've seen all five.
OK hope you like the new place more to come soon.
Despite being nominated for five Best Actress Oscars only two of those films were nominated for Best Picture one being Roman Holiday which we looked at last decade and the other being The Nun's Story. Hepburn plays Gabrielle Van Der Mal the daughter of a brilliant doctor who herself dreams of being a medical professional and decides to become a nun so that she can work in one of the hospitals in the Congo. The first hour of the film is devoted to her becoming a nun, later known as Sister Luke, including her taking orders as well as learning her vows which means she can no longer have memories or want physical things. When it finally comes to time to take her medical exams her mother superior suggest that she fail her exam in order to show humility however when she passes she is assigned to a mental hospital in her native Belgium rather than her preferred destination of the Congo. Finally she is allowed to go to Africa where she works with Peter Finch's brilliant atheist Dr Fucani who tries to get her to open up but her vows won't allow it. While in the Congo she sees the dangers of the country when one of the other nun's is killed by a villager and she is later transported back to Belgium after she contracts TB. Missing her life in the Congo she is called to be a nurse again when she has to treat casualties hurt in the bombing of World War 2 however her feelings towards the Nazi Party make her think that she can be a nun no longer especially when she finds out her father has been killed. The film ends with Gabrielle denouncing her orders and leaving the convent once and for all her experiences their having made her a better person.
As I mentioned the first hour of The Nun's Story is almost exclusively reserved for Gabrielle's transformation into Sister Luke including watching her during dinner and during mass. As you can imagine this is pretty dull at times however it does make you relate to the characters and also what it takes to become a nun in the first place. The film really picks up in when Sister Luke makes it to the Congo partly due to the on-location filming that really makes you feel like you're there with the characters and partly because of Peter Finch. This is the first time we're seeing Finch as part of the Oscar Challenge, it won't be the last, and he makes Fucani his own being very forthright but at the same time you can see he cares about Sister Luke whether that be in a romantic way or just friendly concern is a matter we have to decide for ourselves. What makes The Nun's Story so great though is Hepburn herself who at times is the only reason to keep watching throughout you can really believe her as this young girl forced to leave behind everything she knows to give herself wholly to God. I feel she is better here than in her Oscar-winning turn in Roman Holiday partly because this film is heavier meaning the role has more gravitas and partly because it is a more mature performance. Overall this was a film of two halves one a semi-documentary on how nuns are welcomed into a convent and the other a medical film set in Africa coupled with a World War II movie. Thankfully Audrey Hepburn is the star that makes the most of her role and therefore this film is a lot better for having her be a part of it.
I'm not sure the same can be said for My Fair Lady, at least not all of it, which was the film that won Best Picture at the 1965 Oscar Ceremony. Most of us know the story of Professor Henry Higgins taking flower girl Eliza Dolittle off the street and making a bet with his friend Colonel Pickering that he pass her off as a lady at the next embassy ball. The film deals with their relationship as Eliza develops into a lady with Higgins winning his bet and in turn her being pursued by Freddy Eynsford-Hill a boy of breeding who is charmed by her frank nature. However Eliza has fallen for Higgins and runs away from him after he fails to thank her for winning his bet but at the end of the day she returns to him so we the viewer have to decide what happens next. For me this was Rex Harrison's film rather than Hepburn's his blustering, domineering Higgins is a joy to watch mainly because Harrison makes this brute of a man somewhat sympathetic. For me Hepburn struggles with the earlier segments in which she has to play at being a rough cockney flower-seller and personally I never bought her verbal attacks against Higgins finding them forced at times. Hepburn is better in the latter half of the film after she has almost been transformed into a lady her scenes at the races and the embassy ball being my favourite. Stanley Holloway is also great as Eliza's money-grabbing father as is Gladys Cooper as Higgins' disapproving mother. What's so great about My Fair Lady though is how it looks and how it sounds with the production design splendid, the costumes fantastic and the songs being memorable. This musical boasts some of the most famous songs from the theatre including 'I Could've Danced All Night', 'I've Grown Accustomed to Her Face', 'Get Me to the Church on Time' and my personal favourite 'On the Street Where You Live.' Like with Oliver! and The Sound of Music I'm still not convinced that an old-school musical like this should've won a Best Picture prize but again I will reserve judgment until I've seen all five.
OK hope you like the new place more to come soon.
Monday, 30 April 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 173: Even More Musical Melodies
Back again with another double bill of musicals kicking off with a film that sneaked its way into being one of the five nominees at the 1968 ceremony.
Possibly the least impressive of the four films in this blog is the only one I hadn't seen before that being the original 1967 version of Doctor Dolittle. For me the film is most famous for two things Rex Harrison and the song 'If Could Talk to the Animals' however after reading around the production it seems it has an infamous backstory. Originally projected to cost only $6 million dollars the end budget almost tripled that and the film was known as the picture that almost bought Warner Brothers to its knees. The only reason I'm watching it is due to the studio launching a rather aggressive campaign in which it wined and dined Academy members in order to get seven nominations. It won two deservedly for the ahead-of-their-time special effects, which included a two headed llama and a giant snail, as well as for the aforementioned song. Rex Harrison, who wasn't nominated, was brilliant as the former people doctor who'd turned to animals and learnt to communicate with them but had angered several people around him because of this. The first half of the film deals with his past while the second half sees him take off to find the elusive Great Pink Sea Snail eventually ending up on the floating Sea-Star Island. Personally I'm not quite sure what audience this film is aimed at as many of the songs would be too much for the kids while the romance between Dolittle's assistant played by Anthony Newley and the snotty-nosed Emma is really uninvolving. Bar Harrison, a couple of the songs and the effects this is could be described as a white elephant of a film, incidentally not one of the animals that Dolittle deals with, as large set-pieces on the island plus one at a circus fail to provide any interest. In a year in which more interesting films should've taken the Best Picture slot that Dolittle ended up getting it proves just how easily-influenced the Oscar panel were back in the 1960s and depending on who you listen to not a lot has changed in term of the way things work today.
Ending on a more positive note with the film that won the Best Picture at the final 1960s Oscar ceremony that being Oliver! Unlike a lot of these films, which were basically screen musicals adapted almost note-for-note, the film version of Oliver! changed some roles, got rid of some songs and made the whole thing seem more like a film. For example the second half of the film version has a lot less songs than the stage version does which makes it seem rightly a lot more dramatic and less light-hearted than the first half. Not that you can say most of the plot of Oliver! is generally light-hearted dealing as it does with an orphan who runs away from the workhouse to end up working for a gang of young thieves led by a cunning Jew and a woman-beating Neanderthal. Obviously I'm referring there to Oscar nominee Ron Moody's Fagin and Oliver Reed's Bill Sikes who was a character that had a minimal role in the musical but appears more for the film audience to realise that he's no good. Like Mary Poppins, Oliver is one of the films on this list that I have watched many times before however I approached it this time thinking does this feel like a Best Picture winner? My answer would probably be yes but from an earlier decade as by this time the Academy was awarding more alternative films for example the prior winner to Oliver! was In the Heat of the Night and the one after was Midnight Cowboy. What Oliver! is is a brilliant musical with fine turns from Moody, Reed, Shani Wallis as Nancy, Harry Secombe as Mr Bumble and Jack Wild as The Artful Dodger who was the only other cast member to get an Oscar nomination. There are some great set pieces namely in the 'Consider Yourself' and 'Who Will Buy' numbers the latter of which is one of my favourite moments. However as I am one for darker stuff I love the last twenty minutes most notably Fagin and Dodger's reprise of Reviewing the Situation as well as the eventual capture of Bill, hell even Bullseye the dog is brilliant. In 1969 film was changing however if you'd watched Oliver! as a representation of what movies were like at the time then you wouldn't know it although it is an excellent musical I feel that something grittier could've possibly won in its place but then again I haven't watched its competitors yet so only time will tell.
OK more Oscar blogging to come soon with an Audrey Hepburn double coming up next.
Possibly the least impressive of the four films in this blog is the only one I hadn't seen before that being the original 1967 version of Doctor Dolittle. For me the film is most famous for two things Rex Harrison and the song 'If Could Talk to the Animals' however after reading around the production it seems it has an infamous backstory. Originally projected to cost only $6 million dollars the end budget almost tripled that and the film was known as the picture that almost bought Warner Brothers to its knees. The only reason I'm watching it is due to the studio launching a rather aggressive campaign in which it wined and dined Academy members in order to get seven nominations. It won two deservedly for the ahead-of-their-time special effects, which included a two headed llama and a giant snail, as well as for the aforementioned song. Rex Harrison, who wasn't nominated, was brilliant as the former people doctor who'd turned to animals and learnt to communicate with them but had angered several people around him because of this. The first half of the film deals with his past while the second half sees him take off to find the elusive Great Pink Sea Snail eventually ending up on the floating Sea-Star Island. Personally I'm not quite sure what audience this film is aimed at as many of the songs would be too much for the kids while the romance between Dolittle's assistant played by Anthony Newley and the snotty-nosed Emma is really uninvolving. Bar Harrison, a couple of the songs and the effects this is could be described as a white elephant of a film, incidentally not one of the animals that Dolittle deals with, as large set-pieces on the island plus one at a circus fail to provide any interest. In a year in which more interesting films should've taken the Best Picture slot that Dolittle ended up getting it proves just how easily-influenced the Oscar panel were back in the 1960s and depending on who you listen to not a lot has changed in term of the way things work today.
Ending on a more positive note with the film that won the Best Picture at the final 1960s Oscar ceremony that being Oliver! Unlike a lot of these films, which were basically screen musicals adapted almost note-for-note, the film version of Oliver! changed some roles, got rid of some songs and made the whole thing seem more like a film. For example the second half of the film version has a lot less songs than the stage version does which makes it seem rightly a lot more dramatic and less light-hearted than the first half. Not that you can say most of the plot of Oliver! is generally light-hearted dealing as it does with an orphan who runs away from the workhouse to end up working for a gang of young thieves led by a cunning Jew and a woman-beating Neanderthal. Obviously I'm referring there to Oscar nominee Ron Moody's Fagin and Oliver Reed's Bill Sikes who was a character that had a minimal role in the musical but appears more for the film audience to realise that he's no good. Like Mary Poppins, Oliver is one of the films on this list that I have watched many times before however I approached it this time thinking does this feel like a Best Picture winner? My answer would probably be yes but from an earlier decade as by this time the Academy was awarding more alternative films for example the prior winner to Oliver! was In the Heat of the Night and the one after was Midnight Cowboy. What Oliver! is is a brilliant musical with fine turns from Moody, Reed, Shani Wallis as Nancy, Harry Secombe as Mr Bumble and Jack Wild as The Artful Dodger who was the only other cast member to get an Oscar nomination. There are some great set pieces namely in the 'Consider Yourself' and 'Who Will Buy' numbers the latter of which is one of my favourite moments. However as I am one for darker stuff I love the last twenty minutes most notably Fagin and Dodger's reprise of Reviewing the Situation as well as the eventual capture of Bill, hell even Bullseye the dog is brilliant. In 1969 film was changing however if you'd watched Oliver! as a representation of what movies were like at the time then you wouldn't know it although it is an excellent musical I feel that something grittier could've possibly won in its place but then again I haven't watched its competitors yet so only time will tell.
OK more Oscar blogging to come soon with an Audrey Hepburn double coming up next.
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 172: More Musical Melodies
I know I've been laying low for a while in terms of the Oscar hunt but
that's because I've had other things on soon these posts will have their
own exclusive blog dedicated to them but for the moment I present a
quadruple bill of 1960s musicals. However the characters in the musicals
aren't the most savoury of characters - child thieves, gang members,
murderers and conmen who can all hold a tune, isn't it just lovely. And we'll kick off with the first two films from that quadruple bill.
Starting off with the film that triumphed at the 1962 ceremony - an
update of Romeo and Juliet starring too warring, gun-toting,
all-singing, all-dancing gangs. I'm talking of course of West Side
Story, Leonard Bernstein and Steven Sondheim's classic musical, which
was transplanted to the screen in 1961 to rave reviews. As always with
films that I know quite well it's hard for me to know how much plot
detail to put in but I will say that the film deals with the rival gangs
the Latino-only gang The Sharks and The Jets which are made up of
mainly Polish immigrants. Russ Tamblyn plays Jet leader Riff whose
lieutenant Tony has essentially quit the gang preferring to work at the
local drugstore however he is convinced to come to the dance where both
gangs will arrange a rumble. That's where Tony meets Natalie Wood's
Maria the sister of Bernardo the leader of the Sharks, played by George
Charkiris, with Tony and Maria obviously being the equivalent of Romeo
and Juliet. As we all know the story the two warring factions end up
getting in the way of the love story with both Biff and Bernardo biting
the dust before the final scenes. The only change-up is that Tony is
killed but Maria survives telling the gangs to stop what they are doing
before there is even more bloodshed. For me the opening fifteen minutes
of West Side Story builds it up perfectly with the opening conflict
between the two gangs played out to minimal beats building up to a large
climax which provides the impetus for the rest of the film. Though I do
have a bit of a problem finding gangs that are that in time when
dancing together particularly threatening everything else about this
film is great. While I found Wood and Richard Beymer a little flat as
Maria and Tony there was support elsewhere in two Oscar winning turns
from Chakiris and Rita Moreno the latter playing Bernardo's girl and
Maria's confident. Actually out of all the performances I feel that
Moreno's is the best especially towards the end when The Jets are
circling around her following Bernardo's death. The songs are
spectacular from America to Maria to Someday and the staging is perfect
especially the playground with wire around it a perfect place to start
and end the film. So all in all a perfect Oscar Best Picture winner
then.
Moving on to the next year a less racy and more traditional musical with
The Music Man although it does still feature an unsavoury lead
character in conman Professor Harold Hill who comes to the sleepy Iowa
town of River City to flog band uniforms and instruments to the
unsuspecting townsfolk. Hill is played by Robert Preston, who played the
role on stage, however both Frank Sinatra and Cary Grant were offered
the role with the latter turning it down saying nobody could play it as
well as the man who did on Broadway. Hill is aided in his con by
associate Marcellus who is the only one who knows him by his real name
Gregory. As he is a showman he convinces the majority of the town to
steer away the young folk from the pool tables and instead get them to
take part in a band. His pomp and circumstance is infectious as the
older women of the town form a dance group while the four men on the
school board form a Barbershop Quartet, in actuality they are played by
real life quartet The Buffalo Bills. Hill's main opposition comes from
the town's mayor who wants his credentials and the local librarian
Marian who teaches piano. I was a big fan of The Music Man before
revisiting agan and what I like about it so much is in the little
details from the opening number set on a train that has all the men in
suits and hats complaining about Hill to the final reprise of '76
Trombones' with the whole town now kitted out in their band uniforms.
The other songs are just as brilliant with the most famous being 'Till
There Was You' however my favourite has to be the famous 'Trouble in
River City' in which Hill convinces the people that the pool table is
bad news. Both Preston and Shirley Jones are a great couple with support
coming from the brilliant Buddy Hackett and a young Ron Howard. While
this isn't going to win any points for originality it is still a fine
old-fashioned musical and one of the last of its kind.
Friday, 20 April 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 170-171: Simply Sidney
For those of you who have been following the Oscar challenge you will
now that when I can I group a number of films together by actor or
genre. This is true of this latest trio of films all starring Sidney
Poitier who historically was the first African-American actor to become a
big star and in terms of this was also the first black male to win an
Oscar outside of the honorary categories. We first met him at the tail
end of the 1950s in The Defiant Ones for which he was nominated for a
Best Actor Oscar and his golden touch continues with all the three films
in this list winning at least one award. As you can imagine with a
black actor in the 1960s a lot of these films deal with racial prejudice
with Poitier often playing against how people of his colour were often
portrayed here playing doctors and detectives. But we'll start off with a
film in which he neither plays a professional nor is race the main
issue.
The
film I am referring to is Lilies of the Field the film that won Poitier
his Best Actor Oscar and sees him play Homer Smith a drifter and
jack-of-all trades who has no fixed abode. When his car runs out of
water one day he stops to fill it up at a convent run by Eastern
European nuns with the mother superior of the outfit hiring Homer to do
some work around their property for the day. However after a while he
discovers the mother superior won't let him leave until he has built
them a chapel and he soon learns from others the exploitative nature of
these nuns. At the same time he sympathises with their struggle to leave
their native Germany, they had to climb over the Berlin Wall, and as he
had always wanted to be an architect he sets about trying to build the
chapel. As word spreads people from the community, mainly Hispanics,
come to lend support and materials however Homer refuses their help
wanting this to be a single-handed project. He eventually gets the help
and the chapel is finished however Mother Maria is too proud to let him
stay and so he slips away while the other sisters are singing one of the
Baptist hymns he taught them. Lilies of the Field is such a simple film
but at the same time is lovingly produced and well put together by
director Ralph Nelson. The main theme of the film here is outsiders
coming together in this case an African-American drifter, a group of
East German nuns and poor Hispanic families as they work to construct
something that the community can be proud of. Poitier's performance is
larger-than-life with his laughter being infectious and his general aura
radiating from the screen he is tasked with leading the film for the
most-part and does an excellent job. The desolate locations are
well-filmed by Ernest Haller and there is also an excellent supporting
performance from Lilia Skala as Mother Maria which earned her an Oscar
nod also. This was just a lovely simple tale about family and taking the
gifts that are offered to us when they are given.
Four
years later, at the 1968 ceremony, Sidney starred in two of the five
films nominated for Best Picture including the movie that went onto to
win Best Picture that year - In the Heat of the Night. In this film the
plot is centred around Poitier's Virgil Tibbs' race as he hauled to the
police station in Sparta, Mississippi as he believed to have killed a
man he had never met. The racist police Chief Bill Gillespie, played by
Rod Steiger who won a Best Actor Oscar for this film, is embarrassed to
learn that Tibbs is actually a homicide detective and devices ways to
keep him around in order to have his help on the murder case. As Tibbs'
targets the wealthiest man in Sparta he soon his confronted by a mob who
threaten his life and he is advised by Gillespie to leave the town
however a defiant Tibbs refuses until he's solved the murder. Tibbs is
able to link the crime to the pregnancy of a local teenager who police
officer Sam Wood had taken a liking to and after a conversation with the
local backstreet abortionist he is able to track down his man. However
will it be too late for Tibbs who has angered even more of Sparta's
residents during his snooping. In the Heat of the Night is an excellent
film showing racial prejudice at its most extreme with the scenes in
which Tibbs his hunted down by a mob being very shocking indeed however
the film is also keen to point out that Tibbs is also prejudice against
many of the Sparta police department seeing them as stupid. Though
Poitier does lend almost a moral backbone to the film it is Rod Steiger
who is the star here as Gillespie learns some tolerance and some respect
towards Virgil towards the end of the film. There were some points when
I watched In The Heat of the Night where I wondered if it should've won
the Best Picture award but this film had a good central mystery as well
as having a good message about not judging anyone on where they live or
the colour of their skin.
The
colour of skin also has a massive impact in Poitier's last film here
the outstanding Guess Who's Coming to Dinner. Here Poitier plays widower
doctor John Prentice who while on holiday in Hawaii meets Christina
Drayton and falls in love planning to marry her but first wanting to get
the consent of her parents who he thinks will worry that a black man is
with their white daughter. Christina's parents, played by the brilliant
Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracey the latter in his final film role,
have always preached her tolerance but her father Matt is concerned now
that he may have a black man as a son-in-law. Things get more
complicated when John's parents decide to fly in for dinner despite the
fact he has yet to tell them that he wishes to marry a white girl. The
film is essentially based around people's opinions of a mixed-race
couple for example if love is more important than the colour of
someone's skin. I just found it hard to fault Guess Who's Coming to
Dinner apart from the fact that I think Poitier should've shown up in
the acting categories alongside Hepburn and Tracy both of whom shine
throughout this wonderful film. Possibly it's not as cinematic as it
could been but the performances and script are flawless throughout so by
the time Tracy delivers his final monologue you'll be entrnaced. For me
this was the better of the two Poitier films released this year due to
its themes, acting, music and script. Though out of the three films this
is the one in which Poitier has the least to do yet his presence is
still felt which is the mark of a great actor as is the fact that
everyone of the roles in these three films he plays very differently.
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 169: Just Julie
The second of the bank holiday weekend treats was yet another viewing of the classic that is Mary Poppins which for me was the start of a Julie Andrews double bill as I decided to watch an online copy of The Sound of Music. Like with Streisand in the previous post, Mary Poppins was Andrews' debut film and also earned her a Best Actress Oscar in addition this is to date the Disney film that has been nominated for the most Oscars with a staggering thirteen nods. I don't know how much of a plot summary I have to do for either of these films but essentially Mary Poppins concerns Jane and Michael children of banker George Banks who are constantly unruly and don't really do with nannies. After an incident with some wind and a ripped up note Andrews' Poppins comes into their life and lets them live with free abandon having tea parties on the ceiling and entering an animated world via a painting. However there are life lessons learnt along the way and some darn fine songs with Dick Van Dyke being an added bonus however his cock-er-ney accent leaves a lot to be desired. There's no denying that Mary Poppins is one of the best films that Disney has ever produced and it still looks as good as it ever did. I watched the majority of the film with my mum who seemingly knows every word to every song and it is definitely a film that sticks with you and for me there isn't a bad song among the bunch my favourite meanwhile is an obscure part of the film in which Van Dyke and David Tomlinson duet just before George Banks gets fired. I have to say that the film was revolutionary at the time with its combination of animation and live action which today seems fairly commonplace but these sequences are so expertly put together that the visual effects Oscar that the film won was more than deserved. Overall I challenge anyone to watch Mary Poppins and not enjoy it it is a masterpiece but oddly it wasn't the Julie Andrews film that won Best Picture.
Friday, 6 April 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 168: It's a Little Bit Funny
So this bank holiday has yielded two films that are on my 1960s list for this Oscar Project with the first being Funny Girl the biographical musical of theatre star Fanny Brice which incidentally was briefly covered in 1930s Best Picture winner The Great Ziegfeld with Brice playing herself. Here Brice is played by Barbara Streisand in her debut film performance, for which she won the Best Actress Oscar, as we see her journey from awkward teenager to star of the Ziegfeld Follies. The story starts with Brice trying to get a part in the chorus but realising that instead she should be a headliner due to her comedy timing and great voice. When she finally makes it she falls in love with Omar Sharrif's Nicky Arnestein with whom she runs off abandoning the Follies. Once he has won lots of money playing cards they return to a big mansion and she returns to the Follies however things take a turn for the worst with Nick's business ventures falling through. After the pair move into an apartment Nick feels that he has to be the man despite Fanny earning more than him so agrees to go through with a shady deal and gets arrested for embezzlement. Fanny and Nick reunite briefly but at the end of the day separate mainly so she can go off and make the sequel.
One of about eight musicals that I have to watch during the next fifty films Funny Girl at least had some bite to it and some very familiar songs. I already knew that Don't Rain on My Parade featured prominently and indeed in the scene in which Fanny decides to abandon the Follies to be with Nick her performance is great as it is on People and all of the other songs featured. The star of the show though is undoubtedly Streisand who is on the ball with all her timing and really convinces as the girl who has a great stage presence but lacks maturity when it comes to her personal life. Omar Sharif is always good as the dashing love interest/caddish villain and in this he plays a version of the two a man who feels like his other half is the one wearing the trousers. The Follies productions are also greatly reconstructed although they don't feel as genuine as in the story of Ziegfeld himself here played by veteran actor Walter Pidgeon. While not everything works and I did find myself a trifle board during some of Nick's card games this was an entertaining musical biopic with a stunning debut performance from its lead actress that was more than worthy of the Oscar she won for it.
Thursday, 29 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 167: A Place to Stay in the New Decade
So I was thinking I wouldn't try and start on the 1960s as I've so many other things going on at the moment that it would be a mistake but then I never really listen to myself do I? As I ended the last decade with a winner I decided to start the sixties with one also and it's one that has been sitting on my shelf for ages now that being The Apartment. The first five minutes or so of the film establishes the plot as Jack Lemmon's CC Baxter introduces us to his life in which he rents out his apartment to various bosses from the office in which he works so they can be with their mistresses. In return Baxter hopes to get some sort of promotion so he can impress Shirley MacLaine's kindly elevator operator Fran Kubelik. When his boss Sheldrake offers a promotion it is under the condition that he too get a key to Baxter's apartment which he agrees to but later discovers that his mistress is in fact Fran. When Fran realises that Sheldrake will never leave his wife she overdoses on Baxter's sleeping pills however he finds her just in time and helps her recover growing closer to her in the meantime. So the love triangle then develops between Sheldrake, Fran and Baxter in the final third of the movie and it is essentially rooting for the underdog over the more powerful yet cowardly man.
There are no words to describe how much I love The Apartment and it more than deserved to win the Best Picture award. Once again I think it's the academy giving Billy Wilder an award just because they forgot to even nominate Some Like It Hot for Best Picture the previous year. However from the writing, to the performances and to the lovely majestic score from Adolph Deutsch everything is right about this film. For a starters there's Jack Lemmon a man that can go from slapstick comedy to full on drama in a matter of moments and this role more than suits him as he frantically tries to arrange a schedule to fit all of his philandering superiors into his abode at different times. Shirley MacLaine is equally as brilliant as the beautiful, fragile Fran who does a great job making us sympathise for the other woman who is sleeping with a married man and makes us understand that sometimes you can't help who you fall in love with even if they are already attached. There's such a great chemistry between Lemmon and MacLaine the scenes between them in the apartment are just breath-taking as he gently tries to help her get over her suicide attempt. Billy Wilder demonstrates why he is perhaps the greatest director of all time as every frame tells a story from the humdrum world of the office cubicle to the single man trying to escape his life of drudgery through watching the TV. There's nothing bad about a film that is simply about two lost souls trying to find each other which features lots of laughs, a few tears but plenty of enjoyment. I'm so glad that this is the first film that I watched from this decade and I would recommend all of you go out and watch it immediately.
Sunday, 25 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge: Reviewing the Ceremonies 22-31 (1950-1959)
So here we are at the end of another decade and time for me to look
through the ten ceremonies that took place in the 1950s and if any of
the nominees deserved to win more than the film that actually took home
the prize. However first of all I wanted to have a look at the films
that weren't nominated from the 1949-1958 period classics such as
Singin' in the Rain, Guys and Dolls and a lot of Hitchcock's output
including Vertigo and Rear Window were cut out not to mention the films
that Kurosawa and Bergman were making overseas. It just seems a bit of a
shame that the stunning but shallow Biblical epics and the dreary war
films were passed in favour of some of these films which have stood the
test of time more than the final nominees. With that rant over let's get
on with the review.
Ceremony 22: 1950
Winner: All the King's Men
Nominees: Battleground, The Heiress, A Letter to Three Wives, Twelve o'clock High
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
It seems that Broderick Crawford's political corruption drama was definitely the best of the bunch from the 1949 selection. Of the others The Heiress was a dreary melodrama and the two war films Battleground and Twelve O'Clock High had their moments but were ultimately unmemorable. Only A Letter to Three Wives stood out as a possible contender hence director Joseph L Mankiewicz winner the prize for Best Director and winning the Best Picture prize the year after.
Ceremony 23: 1951
Winner: All About Eve
Nominees: Born Yesterday, Father of the Bride, King Solomon's Mines, Sunset Boulevard
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
Not a lot of discussion here either All About Eve garnered a lot of nominations and they were all richly deserved in one of the best films of all time. If we're splitting hairs then Sunset Boulevard would be the only other real contender but Eve wins it for me every time.
Ceremony 24: 1952
Winner: An American in Paris
Nominees: Decision Before Dawn, A Place in the Sun, Quo Vadis, A Streetcar Named Desire
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Though a charming musical film I don't feel that An American in Paris has the lasting effect that some of the other nominees do. While it's probably better than espionage yarn Decision Before Dawn or biblical epic Quo Vadis it is a toss-up between the other two films for Best Picture. A Place in the Sun did have a great star-making turn from Liz Taylor but A Streetcar Named Desire just edges it for me as it grabs you from beginning to end and had three of the four acting categories sown up only a certain Mr Brando was left out in the cold.
Ceremony 25: 1953
Winner: The Greatest Show on Earth
Nominees: High Noon, Ivanhoe, Moulin Rouge, The Quiet Man
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Possibly the first case of the Academy giving a 'last chance' Oscar to someone who won't have another chance to win one was the fact that Cecil B Demille's film won Best Picture this year. It's true that its live circus atmosphere stays with you but apart from that I'm struggling to remember many details about it. Of the other nominees it is a bit more of a dead cert this year as I would've probably chosen High Noon if I'd been picking as it is the best of a mediocre bunch has a clear storyline and some great performances.
Ceremony 26: 1954
Winner: From Here to Eternity
Nominees: Julius Caesar, The Robe, Roman Holiday, Shane
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
Sort of a mixed bag this year with another big epic, a Shakespeare adaptation, a romantic comedy and a Western as the contenders however it is this Hawaiian war film that is still the iconic piece thanks in no small part to that beach kiss.
Ceremony 27: 1955
Winner: On the Waterfront
Nominees: The Caine Mutiny, The Country Girl, Seven Brides for Seven Brothers, Three Coins in the Fountain
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
There's no going against Elia Kazan's brilliant tale of union corruption and lost dreams with Marlon Brando not a contender but an actual winner. Of the others both The Caine Mutiny and The Country girl showed promise but there was no matching this brilliant film on the night.
Ceremony 28: 1956
Winner: Marty
Nominees: Love is a Many Splendored Thing, Mister Roberts, Picnic, The Rose Tattoo
Did the Right Film Win?: Maybe
It honestly depends on your taste in films but for me Marty was the best of this bunch thanks to Ernest Borgnine's performance as the unlucky in love butcher. Mister Roberts and Picnic were also good films with one being a great war film and the other featuring possibly William Holden's greatest turn. But for me the fact that Marty was set over only 24 hours and the great ensemble cast means that it was my favourite from those on offer.
Ceremony 29: 1957
Winner: Around the World in Eighty Days
Nominees: Friendly Persuasion, Giant, The King and I, The Ten Commandments
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Personally another poor year with this overlong mess stunning Academy members with its exotic locations, slapstick comedy and numerous cameos. Of the other three that I have seen it is Giant that I would pick for a strong turn from Liz Taylor and also from James Dean although for a musical The King and I is also captivating. For me though I'd go for Giant as an alternative winner to this overblown epic.
Ceremony 30: 1958
Winner: The Bridge on the River Kwai
Nominees: Peyton Place, Sayonara, Twelve Angry Men, Witness for the Prosecution
Did the Right Film Win?: Not for Me
So my reasons for saying that the River Kwai wasn't the right winner is because my favourite film of all time 12 Angry Men was up against it. It didn't really stand a chance as it was shot in black-and-white and predominantly stayed in the same set but ultimately people have remembered it more fondly than Kwai. Witness for the Prosecution is also worth a mention for Charles Laughton's great turn as the lawyer and Marlene Dietrich for playing the sultry femme fatale so well.
Ceremony 31: 1959
Winner: Gigi
Nominees: Auntie Mame Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, The Defiant Ones, Separate Tables
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Another musical set in France starring Leslie Caron wins again however the other three nominees in this category were deserved winners. I think for me I would pick Separate Tables due to the ensemble nature of the piece and the fact that it got two of the four acting awards that year. Paul Newman and Liz Taylor sparkle together in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof while Sidney Poitier and Tony Curtis have a great chemistry in The Defiant Ones whilst I also loved Rosalind Russell's overblown turn in Auntie Mame. For me though it's all about the British hotel drama and some great turns from Niven, Kerr, Lancaster and Hayworth.
So those are my picks for the 1950s sees you in the 1960s probably next year some time.
Ceremony 22: 1950
Winner: All the King's Men
Nominees: Battleground, The Heiress, A Letter to Three Wives, Twelve o'clock High
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
It seems that Broderick Crawford's political corruption drama was definitely the best of the bunch from the 1949 selection. Of the others The Heiress was a dreary melodrama and the two war films Battleground and Twelve O'Clock High had their moments but were ultimately unmemorable. Only A Letter to Three Wives stood out as a possible contender hence director Joseph L Mankiewicz winner the prize for Best Director and winning the Best Picture prize the year after.
Ceremony 23: 1951
Winner: All About Eve
Nominees: Born Yesterday, Father of the Bride, King Solomon's Mines, Sunset Boulevard
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
Not a lot of discussion here either All About Eve garnered a lot of nominations and they were all richly deserved in one of the best films of all time. If we're splitting hairs then Sunset Boulevard would be the only other real contender but Eve wins it for me every time.
Ceremony 24: 1952
Winner: An American in Paris
Nominees: Decision Before Dawn, A Place in the Sun, Quo Vadis, A Streetcar Named Desire
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Though a charming musical film I don't feel that An American in Paris has the lasting effect that some of the other nominees do. While it's probably better than espionage yarn Decision Before Dawn or biblical epic Quo Vadis it is a toss-up between the other two films for Best Picture. A Place in the Sun did have a great star-making turn from Liz Taylor but A Streetcar Named Desire just edges it for me as it grabs you from beginning to end and had three of the four acting categories sown up only a certain Mr Brando was left out in the cold.
Ceremony 25: 1953
Winner: The Greatest Show on Earth
Nominees: High Noon, Ivanhoe, Moulin Rouge, The Quiet Man
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Possibly the first case of the Academy giving a 'last chance' Oscar to someone who won't have another chance to win one was the fact that Cecil B Demille's film won Best Picture this year. It's true that its live circus atmosphere stays with you but apart from that I'm struggling to remember many details about it. Of the other nominees it is a bit more of a dead cert this year as I would've probably chosen High Noon if I'd been picking as it is the best of a mediocre bunch has a clear storyline and some great performances.
Ceremony 26: 1954
Winner: From Here to Eternity
Nominees: Julius Caesar, The Robe, Roman Holiday, Shane
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
Sort of a mixed bag this year with another big epic, a Shakespeare adaptation, a romantic comedy and a Western as the contenders however it is this Hawaiian war film that is still the iconic piece thanks in no small part to that beach kiss.
Ceremony 27: 1955
Winner: On the Waterfront
Nominees: The Caine Mutiny, The Country Girl, Seven Brides for Seven Brothers, Three Coins in the Fountain
Did the Right Film Win?: Yes
There's no going against Elia Kazan's brilliant tale of union corruption and lost dreams with Marlon Brando not a contender but an actual winner. Of the others both The Caine Mutiny and The Country girl showed promise but there was no matching this brilliant film on the night.
Ceremony 28: 1956
Winner: Marty
Nominees: Love is a Many Splendored Thing, Mister Roberts, Picnic, The Rose Tattoo
Did the Right Film Win?: Maybe
It honestly depends on your taste in films but for me Marty was the best of this bunch thanks to Ernest Borgnine's performance as the unlucky in love butcher. Mister Roberts and Picnic were also good films with one being a great war film and the other featuring possibly William Holden's greatest turn. But for me the fact that Marty was set over only 24 hours and the great ensemble cast means that it was my favourite from those on offer.
Ceremony 29: 1957
Winner: Around the World in Eighty Days
Nominees: Friendly Persuasion, Giant, The King and I, The Ten Commandments
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Personally another poor year with this overlong mess stunning Academy members with its exotic locations, slapstick comedy and numerous cameos. Of the other three that I have seen it is Giant that I would pick for a strong turn from Liz Taylor and also from James Dean although for a musical The King and I is also captivating. For me though I'd go for Giant as an alternative winner to this overblown epic.
Ceremony 30: 1958
Winner: The Bridge on the River Kwai
Nominees: Peyton Place, Sayonara, Twelve Angry Men, Witness for the Prosecution
Did the Right Film Win?: Not for Me
So my reasons for saying that the River Kwai wasn't the right winner is because my favourite film of all time 12 Angry Men was up against it. It didn't really stand a chance as it was shot in black-and-white and predominantly stayed in the same set but ultimately people have remembered it more fondly than Kwai. Witness for the Prosecution is also worth a mention for Charles Laughton's great turn as the lawyer and Marlene Dietrich for playing the sultry femme fatale so well.
Ceremony 31: 1959
Winner: Gigi
Nominees: Auntie Mame Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, The Defiant Ones, Separate Tables
Did the Right Film Win?: No
Another musical set in France starring Leslie Caron wins again however the other three nominees in this category were deserved winners. I think for me I would pick Separate Tables due to the ensemble nature of the piece and the fact that it got two of the four acting awards that year. Paul Newman and Liz Taylor sparkle together in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof while Sidney Poitier and Tony Curtis have a great chemistry in The Defiant Ones whilst I also loved Rosalind Russell's overblown turn in Auntie Mame. For me though it's all about the British hotel drama and some great turns from Niven, Kerr, Lancaster and Hayworth.
So those are my picks for the 1950s sees you in the 1960s probably next year some time.
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 166: Bridging the Gap Between the Decades
So somehow I've finished the 1950s I didn't think it would ever happen and no doubt it will take me another year before I make it through the 1960s however as I have done before I will end on a winner. The Bridge on the River Kwai is yet another war film but unlike Battleground or 12 o'clock High it doesn't feature men up in the air or down on the ground instead we journey to Thailand and a Japanese prisoner of war camp during the war. When first we get to the camp we meet William Holden's Commander Shears who has been there for quite some time and dreams of escape. At the same time Alec Guinness' Colonel Nicholson arrives with his men and his told by the camp commander Colonel Saito that all men must work on the new railway bridge including the officers. Nicholson's refusal to let his officers work results in a stand-off with the British ultimately winning as Nicholson is released and agrees to help out by using his resources in the right way. Meanwhile Shears has escaped but almost drowns thankfully he is rescued by people in a small town and taken to the nearest army hospital where he has a bit of a fling with one of the nurses. He is then commandeered by the British Major Warden to help in his commando mission to blow the bridge up at the same time as Nicholson is finishing his work and thanking Saito for co-operating. The final stand-off sees those who are trying to blow the bridge up come up against the team of Nicholson and Saito with only one surviving in the film's final spectacular scene.
I really think that The Bridge on the River Kwai is a film of two halves one in which Alec Guinness and Sessue Hayakawa verbally spar with one another over the officers issue and the other in which William Holden and Jack Hawkins creep back to the camp to blow the bridge up. It is this first half that is the better one with Guinness' British resilience earning him a Best Actor Oscar however Hayakwa is equally as compelling and one wouldn't be nearly as good as the other. Maybe I'm just suffering from William Holden fatigue but his leading role in the film was overshadowed by the other acts despite his being the star name here. There are far too many scenes of the creeping through the jungle for my liking and I wish the second film would've been more equally split as I feel that Nicholson's need to get the bridge finished on time is as important to the final scene as the men coming to blow it up. Those criticisms aside though this is a great film thanks to the work of David Lean who used to all of the elements available to him to sculpt a beautifully looking film with a captivating plot. From Jack Hildyard's cinematography to the adapted screenplay everything is on fine form here and overall there is a believable thread to the narrative especially in the relationship between Saito and Nicholson. Though I personally don't believe this should've won Best Picture, see the next post for more details, this is certainly one of the best British films of all times and any other year it would be a no-brainer for the top award. Overall a great-looking well-acted spectacularly-written war movie which is only slightly hindered by its middle section.
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 165: Burning Love
We travel from the blood-soaked fields of World War 2 to Ancient Rome under Emperor Nero for our penultimate 1950s film Quo Vadis. The film is very similar to previous entries on this list such as The Ten Commandments and The Robe in so much as they try to utilise the new technicolor methods to create a vivid story while at the same time referencing parts of The Bible. In this case we have Rome just after the death of Jesus, although Peter features quite predominantly throughout, where the Christians are living in private and here are represented by Deborah Kerr's Lygia. Playing opposite Kerr is Robert Taylor as Marcus Vinicius a returning Roman soldier whose uncle Petronius is one of Nero's most trusted advisors and who becomes intrigued with Christianity through is infatuation with Lygia. When the slightly crazy Nero, played by the brilliant Peter Ustinov, decides to burn Rome and blame the Christians people start to believe that he has gone loopy while Potronious goes so far as to kill himself. Both Lygia and Marcus are arrested and then are married by Peter before he himself is crucified upside down. Nero's wife, who has been knocked back by Marcus, decides to teach the couple a lesson by setting Lygia up to be gored by a bull in the coliseum and chaining Marcus up so he has to watch. Eventually Nero is overthrown and has one of his slaves kill him as he is too cowardly to take his own life so the film ends with Lygia and Marcus able to leave Rome as we see Peter's staff and here his words being spoken to those who are lucky enough to have survived Nero's tyrannical reign.
Always when writing these reviews I try and think what I will most remember about this film after having watched it and in the case of Quo Vadis there are two points. Firstly the epic scale of it all as this is very similar to a Cecil B Demille picture complete with an entire sequence with Rome burning to the ground and then another scene featuring live animals trying to attract Nero's prisoners in the coliseum. The other memorable aspect of Quo Vadis is Peter Ustinov's performance as Nero, for which he was nominated for Best Supporting Actor, playing this evil man in quite a child-like manner changing his ideas on a whim and often being manipulated by his devious wife whom he finally cottons onto and kills just before the end scene. It is Ustinov you always look forward to seeing because Robert Taylor is such a wooden actor and you don't believe for one minute that he is the great Roman soldier in fact he just seems like another beefcake actor while Deborah Kerr here is on poor form possibly being ill-served with a role in which she doesn't do much than follow other men's leads. So all in all this is a colourful romp through Ancient Rome which lasts far too long, its running time is almost three hours, but has a great performance from Ustinov. While this isn't a great film it does highlight a time where film-makers were using techniques to recreate these epic stories so in those terms Quo Vadis is an interesting film to watch if not just in a historical context.
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 164: Lonely Hearts
There were mixed responses to the fact that The Artist won Best Picture at last Sunday's Oscar awards as some sort is as a great film while others thought it was a fad. However isn't the greatest marker of an award winning film longevity? So films I have watched such as Gone with the Wind and Casablanca are still watched today but others such as 1956 winner Marty is now a film that barely anybody knows which is a shame. Ernest Borgnine also won the Best Actor Oscar for playing the titular character a heavy-set butcher who is the only bachelor in his family with all of his younger brothers and sisters having flown the nest after getting married. The opening scene shows us perfectly of the community's feelings about Marty as his customers, who he is perfectly civil to, tell him he should be ashamed of himself for not having got married yet. His mother convinces him to go with his friend to a ballroom where he feels out of his depth and none of the girls want to dance with him because of his size. He then gets approached by a caddish fellow who wants to pay him to look after his plain date because he has had a better offer. Marty is disgusted by this offer but later approaches Clara and the two begin dancing and spend the night walking around the city. They discover they have a lot in common as they are both looked down on by the opposite sex so essentially they find solace in each other. However Marty's friends and mother who all meet Clara try and disuade him from calling her the next day but mainly for their own selfish reasons so the question is will he try and make a date with the only girl who has ever made him happy?
Even though I'd never heard of it you can see the influence in Marty through a lot of films featuring male protagonists from The Apartment, which would win Best Picture five years later, to the Oscar nominated male menopause movies of Alexander Payne. At the heart of this film is the central performance from Ernest Borgnine who is able to convey Marty's friendliness and also his heartbreak in equal measure we get the feeling that this is a decent guy who is just misunderstood by a lot people. However Borgnine would be nothing without director Delbert Mann or especially screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky who also got Oscars for this piece. Of the other cast members I thought Betsy Blair was a great Clara some would call her mousy but she really comes out of herself after her initial meeting with Marty. I also enjoyed Esther Mincotti and Augusta Ciolli as Marty's mother and aunt with these two old Italian women representing a different time and the two scenes in which they both feature are terribly moving and funny in equal measure as I suppose is the film itself. I suppose there are many reasons that Marty hasn't stood the test of time maybe because it's a fairly quiet film and it's one of the shortest Best Picture winners of all time but perhaps some people feel it dated. But for me this is a great little character study and maybe go as far as to say that this is a forgotten gem which got me wondering will we be saying the same thing about The Artist in 56 years time?
Saturday, 17 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 163: Up, Up and Away
Another day, another war film however at least this one takes things from the soldiers on foot to those up in the air as we join the men looking to go Twelve o'clock High. Henry King's film centres on the 918th Heavy Bombardment Group known as a 'hard luck group' to most as they often suffer fatalities and very few missions see all the men from this squadron return back safely. A lot of the blame for this can be centred on their commander Keith Davenport who is too personal with his team and has driven himself crazy with worry so those in charge believe that he needs to be replaced. They eventually decide that his replacement should be his friend Frank Savage a more level-headed gent who has been working a desk job up to this point in the war. Savage initially alienates most of the company as he chastises them for not carrying out proper security checks, wearing the wrong uniform and generally having a bad attitude. Just before most of the company are about to ask for transfers he is advised by Major Stovall, played by Dean Jagger who won a Best Supporting Actor award for his role, to try and draft in a young pilot and he does this by bringing in Jesse Bishop. Soon the group warm to Savage but like Davenport he starts to go a bit bonkers as the war begins to be fought more and more in the air and it is the task of those around him to try and keep him sane.
For a film set during the war and about flying squads, 12 o'clock High doesn't half feature a lot of men talking in rooms so much so that if it was made today you would've thought Aaron Sorkin had written in it. Of course all the procedural dialogue is important in order for the audience to know how and why the powers-that-be have chosen Savage as a replacement for Davenport but it drags down the first half an hour or so of the film. The film really starts getting going when Gregory Peck takes the helm and his performance as the initially by-the-book Savage is the greatest strength of Twelve o'clock High. He is ably assisted by Dean Jagger who gives a great performance as the former lawyer Stovall who becomes Savage's greatest ally and indeed is the person who is featured first and last in this film while I'm not sure if this was an Oscar-worthy role it is certainly a memorable one in terms of the film's ensemble cast. The most spectacular scenes are those when we are allowed up in the air with the squadron as they try and take down the superior Luftwaffe. This is also a very patriotic film as we see a German radio station mocking the bad luck squadron and the film ends with a celebration of everything these men fought for only several years prior. So an uneven film which really gets going once Peck emerges as the star and we are able to enjoy some spectacular aerial sequences but one that perhaps relies too much on patriotic feelings to get its point across.
Thursday, 15 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 162: More War Stories
It seems that as I wrap up the 1950s I have left all the war films till the last minute which I'm not sure was a subconscious decision or not. The lasest one is Battleground which apparently is the first significant film to be made about World War 2 after the conflict had finished. Just like the previous film in this list, Decision Before Dawn, this is based on a group of soldiers in the latter stages of 1944. We find Jim Layton being bought in as a replacement soldier into a squad in the 101st Airborne Division who at first completely ignore him as they have no time for the new man in their unit. They are sent into the Ardennes to prepare for a surprise attack by the Germans just as Holley, star of the show Van Johnson, returns to the group and is soon given leadership after the original captain is injured. The film tries to portray a pretty realistic version of events as men are routinely injured and some don't survive their deaths being pretty quick including one young soldier who is killed when a house starts to collapse. Even big names such as Ricardo Montalaban, here playing Latin American Roderigues, don't survive in his case he freezes to death after his squad forget about him. Layton is eventually accepted as part of the team and is paired with the popular Holley and just as the squad prepare to give up hope they are replaced and able to go back but even after all their turmoil they still march in line and sing along with their commander as they leave.
For me the best thing about Battleground is the interaction between the actors so much so that I felt that this was one of the most believable war films I'd ever seen. The first thirty minutes or so establishes the relationships between soldiers during the war including the cold shoulder treatment that a lot of rookies are subjected to and the banter that flies around them. It is also interesting that none of these men are presented as heroes and at one point or another most of them think about fleeing rather than carrying out their duties of stopping the German attack. There were some great turns here including from Van Johnson as the sarcastic Holley and Marshall Thompson as the impressionable Layton however there were so many characters here that I couldn't keep up with some of them and I felt that a couple could've been cut or at least given smaller roles so I knew who to concentrate on. Like with Decision Before Dawn everything looks quite realistic from the costume design to the way that the soldiers walk around their snowy surroundings as they discover if there is someone lurking around the corner wanting to kill them. I think that all involved with the script and the making of the film did their research as I really enjoyed Battleground it painted a picture of the Batcamaraderie or war and also the loneliness and how fleeting life can be. Apart from the overabundance of characters there's not much to complain about in a very accomplished film that has been forgotten as the years have gone by.
Monday, 12 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 161: Sour Krauts
It's interesting to watch some of these films from the late 1940s and early 1950s as the subject of the Second World War starts to produce more interesting ideas. A case in point is Decision Before Dawn a film which focuses on the closing year of the conflict when the majority of Germans had resigned to the fact that they had lost the war. It follows a group of American soldiers who recruit German prisoners of war to spy on their former allies in order to escape their camps. One of the latest recruits is a young soldier simply known as 'Happy' whose friend was killed by other prisoners of wars for spouting his ideas about the war. Happy is chosen to go on a mission with the team along with 'Tiger' a cynical man who the Americans distrust because he came back without his partner while the American chosen to go with them is Rennick one of the allies who doesn't agree with teaming up with Germans. We then see most of the mission through the eyes of Happy as he sees the differing attitudes of his countrymen at the tail end of the war with some surrendering to their ultimate fate and some still feeling patriotic. Happy then is able to infiltrate himself safely into the fold by making friends with a commander but also sees what could possibly happen to him when another deserter is executed. With Happy meeting up with Rennick and Tiger they still face adversity going back to the camp as the Germans start to cotton on to their plan.
Decision Before Dawn is a film that I struggled with but one that had its merits which was mainly creating an amount of peril throughout Happy's mission. The initial set-up of introducing the idea of what the Germans and the Americans are trying to accomplish was a little bit slapdash and I didn't understand it right off the bat but then things got interesting once the three set off. I liked the fact that there was dissension in the ranks between Tiger and Rennick and also the fact that this wasn't the main story instead it was the morally torn Happy who got the bulk of the work. To his credit Oskar Werner was able to carry the film and did a good job in an interesting role with his facial expressions speaking bundles about what Happy was going through. The only other cast member who really had an impact on me was O.E. Hasse as the brutal commander Oberst Von Ecker who was a great German villain. The other thing that impressed me were the effects and at times I really did feel that these three men were in genuine peril with bombs going off all around them and the final tense scenes were real edge-of-your-seat stuff. The main problem I had was that most of it was fairly forgettable and in terms of its place on the Oscar nominations list it almost scenes like a last minute pick as it doesn't seem to have nearly as many nods as its competitors. So Decision Before Dawn is a solid Second World War movie but there isn't a lot to mark it out from a lot of the other films based around this conflict.
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 160: The Last Days of Summer
There are several stars that keep cropping up during each decade and in the 1950s it's William Holden from the brilliant Sunset Boulevard to the melodramatic Love is a Many Splendored Thing he's excelled at playing male leads and the latest film Picnic is somewhere in the middle. Set over 24 hours in an idyllic Kansas town it features Holden's Hal Carter coming into town having stowed away on a freight train and is now eager to find his old college pal Alan Benson as he believes Benson's father will give him a job. Before finding Alan, Hal first encounters Alan's sweetheart Madge Owens and her bookish sister Millie. Alan initially offers Hal a job wanting to impress the college football hero, now that he has fallen on hard times but obviously he catches the eyes of both of the sisters with Millie suddenly discovering hormones and dressing up for Alan. The title of the film refers to the Labour Day picnic which signals the end of the summer and will be the last time for Madge and Alan to announce that they're going steady. Along with Hal, Alan and the Owen sisters the picnic also comes kindly old lady Mrs Potts, the single parent of the two girls, store owner Howard and his would-be love schoolteacher Rosemary. The film's pivotal scene is where Hal and Madge are dancing and a drunken Rosemary breaks it up wanting to prove she is still young and exposes him for what he really is in what felt like a scene from a Tennessee Williams story. After being blamed for getting Millie drunk he runs away with Alan now jealous of him he decides to skip town but the question is will Madge come with him?
Of all of these films I think this is the one in which Holden is fully showing off his sex symbol status and Hal does find any excuse to remove his shirt or have it ripped from him. To be fair he does add some substance to his physique portraying the fading jock who once used his looks to help him get by but now realises he should've worked harder and not flunked out. He has great chemistry with Kim Novak as Madge with the scene in which they dance being the film's most memorable as they sizzle and create jealousy from most of the other characters. Also worth a mention is Rosalind Russell as Rosemary a woman who transfers her own fears about growing old and alone onto the unstable Hal with her diatribe directed towards him being fairly brutal. Another plus point in terms of Picnic was the idea of this damaged character coming into this small town and changing everyone's lives within a 24 hour period. The downside was the fact that as there was so many characters some of them got little time to develop and that's true of the girl's mother played by Betty Field who essentially becomes a cliché full of worry and nagging in addition the music was a bit over the top for a film which was on the whole subtly filmed. Overall a great character-led piece which should've been nominated for more acting awards which gave a story of a man languishing as he readied himself for middle age.
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 159: In My Place
Peyton
Place is a name that I know mainly as a TV series of the 1960s however
before that it was a 1956 novel which was quickly bought and turned into
a film the following year. The film follows six young people who are
all to graduate from Peyton Place high school and move on with their
lives while also portraying their parents in different lights. Central
to the film is Lana Turner's Connie McKenzie a dress maker who has
returned from New York to her hometown with her daughter Allison who was
later revealed to be the product of an affair she had with a married
man. Allison's childhood has been quite sheltered but when she blossoms
as a woman her affections turn to local outsider Norman Page who also
has a parent who does allow him to grow up. Connie is pursued by new
headmaster Michael Rossi who hopes to crack her hard exterior and does
so briefly but she begins to worry about her daughter once the
revelation of her parentage gets out. Allison's best friend is Selena
Cross the daughter of the McKenzie's cleaner Nellie and whose stepfather
Lucas begins to abuse her so one night she eventually snaps and kills
him. Finally there is Rodney Harrington son of Peyton Place's wealthiest
town member who is drawn to the promiscuous Betty Anderson a match that
his father disapproves of because of her reputation in the town.
The main problem I had initially with Peyton Place was getting to the bottom of all the stories and meeting all the characters but once I did I started to enjoy it. I did though find it was far too long clocking in at over two hours and I felt the Rodney and Betty storyline could've been cut as it came to a conclusion a while before the film had finished. There are some great performances here which is evident by the fact that the film received five acting nominations including a Lead Actress nod for Lana Turner who was great as the emotionally fraught Connie. My favourite member of the cast was Hope Lange, another Supporting Actress nominee, whose Selena is initially presented as quite weak but learns to fight back after a horrific incident involving stepfather Lucas. This is at its heart a melodrama and at times the music got too much as the dramatic scenes were almost outshone by the booming score. What I did like though was the fact that a lot of people are afraid to let their true feelings come out in a town where there are far too many gossips so they keep things like illegitimacy and rape to themselves. The costumes are also well made however the hair styles could do with some work especially in the case of Lee Phillips who has some really bad grey hair dye applied to him when playing Michael Rossi. Peyton Place is a good bit of trashy fiction which is over long but well acted and unlike a lot of films in this list a deserving Oscar nominee.
The main problem I had initially with Peyton Place was getting to the bottom of all the stories and meeting all the characters but once I did I started to enjoy it. I did though find it was far too long clocking in at over two hours and I felt the Rodney and Betty storyline could've been cut as it came to a conclusion a while before the film had finished. There are some great performances here which is evident by the fact that the film received five acting nominations including a Lead Actress nod for Lana Turner who was great as the emotionally fraught Connie. My favourite member of the cast was Hope Lange, another Supporting Actress nominee, whose Selena is initially presented as quite weak but learns to fight back after a horrific incident involving stepfather Lucas. This is at its heart a melodrama and at times the music got too much as the dramatic scenes were almost outshone by the booming score. What I did like though was the fact that a lot of people are afraid to let their true feelings come out in a town where there are far too many gossips so they keep things like illegitimacy and rape to themselves. The costumes are also well made however the hair styles could do with some work especially in the case of Lee Phillips who has some really bad grey hair dye applied to him when playing Michael Rossi. Peyton Place is a good bit of trashy fiction which is over long but well acted and unlike a lot of films in this list a deserving Oscar nominee.
Friday, 9 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 158: Johnny Irish
It's sometimes interesting to see people outside of their comfort zone so when Johns both Wayne and Ford collaborated on The Quiet Man it was somewhat of a shock as they're primarily known for their westerns. Previously on the Oscar Search we've seen them work together on Stagecoach while later films included The Man who Shot Liberty Valace and The Searchers but in The Quiet Man it is much more of a serene affair with Wayne playing a romantic lead. The plot sees Wayne play Sean Thornton a man who was raised in the Irish town and returns ready to purchase his old family farm but raises the ire of local businessman Will Danaher when he outbids him for the property. Sean also becomes besotted with Will's sister Mary Kate and after some traditional yet bizarre courting rituals the two marry however when Will finds out that he has been duped by the pair he refuses to give her all of his dowry. Mary Kate wants her new husband to defend her honour but he keeps claiming that he didn't marry her for her money but thanks to the local town holy men he later learns that traditions mean a lot to the locals. Will challenges Sean to a boxing match however in his old life he was a boxer who quit when he killed an opponent but after getting over his nerves he battles his brother-in-law all over town before they get over their differences and end up in the pub.
The main thing I remember about The Quiet Man is the focus on traditional customs and culture with Wayne as the outsider baffled by some of them as we the audience similarly are. For example in one set piece the men ride horses to collect the Easter bonnets of the women they intend to court while the courting itself is supervised by one of the town elders. If I was someone who didn't know about Ireland and therefore thought this was accurate portrayal then I certainly would think it was a backward place where squabbles are sorted out with boxing matches and all women care about is money. Wayne also feels outside of his comfort zone here and his trademark slowed down speech doesn't suit a film in which everyone else is in high spirits with fast-paced Irish accents. Thankfully co-stars Maureen O'Hara, Barry Fitzgerald and Victor McLaglen are all in high spirits and try to aide Wayne as much as they can. Though the Irish customs are rather outdated the Irish countryside is beautifully shot and the film deserved its Best Cinematography award though I'm not quite sure about Ford winning yet another Best Director prize. The best way to describe The Quiet Man is a quaint romance with an unsure male lead but some stunning camera work that beautifully captures the Irish scenery.
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 157: Just Before Eve
For most film fans the name Joseph L Mankiewicz will be most familiar as the director and writer of All About Eve one of the most nominated Oscar films of all time. However one year prior to this success Mankiewicz won the directing and screenwriting awards for another film entitled A Letter to Three Wives. The three wives of the title are Jeanne Crain's Deborah Bishop, Ann Sothern's Rita Phipps and Linda Darnell's Lora Mae Hollingsworth who are all informed via a letter that one of their husbands has ran off with mutual acquaintance Addie Ross. The problem is that Addie's letter doesn't reveal which husband it is so all three women, who are about to board a boat to volunteer on a picnic for orphans, have to play the waiting game until they reach dry land. Addie Ross narrates the piece from beginning to end showing us around the neighbourhood and introducing the three women however she is never seen. In flashback we see the state of the three marriages and why the husbands may've run off with Addie. Firstly Deborah, who is married to Addie's first love Brad, a farmer's daughter who met her husband while they were both in the navy and is now nervous about meeting his friends whom she feel are in a higher class than herself. In the flashback we see her journey to her first dance with the other couples and getting so nervous that she drinks too much and ends up throwing up just as Addie turns up at the end. Next we see Rita's marriage to school-teacher George, played by Kirk Douglas, who writes for the radio and is often dominated by her boss who demands constant re-writes. George often feels emasculated by his wife who earns more than him and we flashback to a dinner party thrown in her boss' honour however she is so busy that she has forgot her husband's birthday something that Addie hasn't done giving him a record as a present. Finally Rita Mae's marriage to retail king Porter is depicted in detail showing her living in squalor next to the railway tracks and wanting to be a wife to someone of Porter's status but there is a hint that he himself is also taken with Addie as there is a picture of her on his piano. The end of the film reveals who it is that has run off with Addie and the consequences that this revelation has.
At first watching A Letter to Three Wives I felt that I was getting some soppy melodrama but once I learnt that Mankiewicz was involved and I was introduced to the characters I really got into it. I could really see elements of All About Eve in the film including the narration from someone who isn't necessary involved in all parts of the story as well as a strong female presence and the themes of advancing in social circles. Indeed the film also features two uncredited roles for All About Eve cast-members with Thelma Ritter playing the Phipps' home help Sadie who is very similar to the role of Birdie that she would play in Mankiewicz's next film while Celeste Holm was also present in voice form only giving an airy quality to the mysterious Addie. Of the six central performances I think Kirk Douglas was brilliant as the put-upon George a man who has to deal with his lot in life and the fact that his wife earns a lot more money than he does. Of the wives themselves Linda Darnell is both sexy and compelling as the woman who has come the furthest and who secretly loves her husband even though you wouldn't know it. The script is incredibly clever and the direction is masterful and while this film isn't as great as Mankiewicz's classic it is certainly a pre-cursor to what this man would produce the following year.
Saturday, 3 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 155-156: Opening the Book
This time on the Oscar Blog two films that were based on popular novels
and both that won awards for cinematography and editing as well as the
second winning many more.
But
we start with King Solomon's Mines, a nominee from the 1951 ceremony,
which was based on the novel by H Rider Haggard. Obviously this version,
which starred Raymond Massey as the explorer Allan Quatermain wasn't
the first adaptation of the book or the last but was arguably the most
successful due to its exterior locations which at the time would've
surprised audiences. The main story sees Quatermain tasked as guide to
John Goode and his sister Elizabeth Curtis played by Deborah Kerr so
that they can hope to find her husband who went on a mission to discover
the mines of the title. During their time the trio come across a
menagerie of African wildlife, a British fugitive and are almost trapped
in a cave by a dastardly African king. The end of the film sees rebel
forces try and overthrow the king while the whereabouts of Elizabeth's
husband are also revealed. King Solomon's Mines is quite a stilted film
and indeed the directorial style of Compton Bennett and Andrew Marton is
rather basic. Some of the scenes between Elizabeth and Allen feel very
cold and there is no chemistry between the pair who are supposed to be
your romantic coupling. Massey isn't a particularly commanding lead so
it isn't surprising that he wasn't the original choice for the role
while Deborah Kerr tries her best but doesn't get a lot to do other than
look frightened by what's going on. Instead the real star here is
location scout Eva Monley who picked some of the best African backdrops
to host the film which to a 1950s audience would seem quite new and
exciting as would all the African rituals and the numerous beasts that
the trio run into throughout their adventures. As a postcard from Africa
it does the job fairly well but I didn't find it very exciting and
though it wasn't particularly long it still felt baggy and lagged in
several places.
But if King Solomon's Mines was baggy I think that Around the World in 80 Days, the winner at the 1957 ceremony, must be described as incredibly overlong. The whole film clocks in at a whopping 183 minutes which includes an intermission and a lengthy and well-produced end credits sequence which in fact is one of the best things about the film. It even has a convoluted start with journalist Edward R Murrow showing footage of George Melies' A Trip to the Moon and linking it together with the stories of Jules Verne. We all know the basic story of the film which sees Phileas Fogg wager with his fellow reform club members that he cannot navigate around the globe in eighty days. He sets off on a mission with his new manservant Passepartout as they journey around the world on different forms of transport including balloons, steam liners and trains which are constantly breaking down. The film also introduces a romantic aspect as the pair rescue Shirley MacLaine's princess from being burnt alive while in India and she forms a romantic attachment to Fogg while he is also being chased around the globe by Robert Newton's Mr Fix a Scotland Yard detective who believes Fogg to have stolen from the Bank of England. That's about all the plot as the film jumps from set-piece to set-piece a lot of which feature Passepartout fooling around whether it is at a bull-fight or performing on stage he is given more spotlight than Fogg mainly because he is being portrayed by Latin American comedian Cantinflas who was one of the main draws of the film. To be fair Cantinflas is a lot more engaging than David Niven, who plays Fogg, almost acting as a sort of modern day Charlie Chaplin and he does indeed steal the film. This version of Around the World was conceived by producer Michael Todd, the third husband of Elizabeth Taylor, who fancied himself as a bit of Cecil B De Mille type and had a grand vision of what he wanted this film to look like. Indeed this film is heavy on scenery if light on plot with all the different locations being well-scouted and well-shot so I do think it deserved that cinematography Oscar. The film also has a cavalcade of cameos from Frank Sinatra playing the piano to Buster Keaton as a train conductor there were about fourty appearances of this nature so after a while this began to get a bit tiresome. Whether it deserved the Best Picture Oscar we will discover when I come to the end of the 1950s but this is a film that looks stunning and has a great slapstick performance from Cantinflas even if it is far too long and has too many unnecessary elements to it I feel that certain elements will stick in my mind long after I have watched the film something that can't be said about King Solomon's Mines. So out of these two films I would say that Around the World in 80 Days is definitely the superior of the two but I don't think that's a particularly hard battle to win.
But if King Solomon's Mines was baggy I think that Around the World in 80 Days, the winner at the 1957 ceremony, must be described as incredibly overlong. The whole film clocks in at a whopping 183 minutes which includes an intermission and a lengthy and well-produced end credits sequence which in fact is one of the best things about the film. It even has a convoluted start with journalist Edward R Murrow showing footage of George Melies' A Trip to the Moon and linking it together with the stories of Jules Verne. We all know the basic story of the film which sees Phileas Fogg wager with his fellow reform club members that he cannot navigate around the globe in eighty days. He sets off on a mission with his new manservant Passepartout as they journey around the world on different forms of transport including balloons, steam liners and trains which are constantly breaking down. The film also introduces a romantic aspect as the pair rescue Shirley MacLaine's princess from being burnt alive while in India and she forms a romantic attachment to Fogg while he is also being chased around the globe by Robert Newton's Mr Fix a Scotland Yard detective who believes Fogg to have stolen from the Bank of England. That's about all the plot as the film jumps from set-piece to set-piece a lot of which feature Passepartout fooling around whether it is at a bull-fight or performing on stage he is given more spotlight than Fogg mainly because he is being portrayed by Latin American comedian Cantinflas who was one of the main draws of the film. To be fair Cantinflas is a lot more engaging than David Niven, who plays Fogg, almost acting as a sort of modern day Charlie Chaplin and he does indeed steal the film. This version of Around the World was conceived by producer Michael Todd, the third husband of Elizabeth Taylor, who fancied himself as a bit of Cecil B De Mille type and had a grand vision of what he wanted this film to look like. Indeed this film is heavy on scenery if light on plot with all the different locations being well-scouted and well-shot so I do think it deserved that cinematography Oscar. The film also has a cavalcade of cameos from Frank Sinatra playing the piano to Buster Keaton as a train conductor there were about fourty appearances of this nature so after a while this began to get a bit tiresome. Whether it deserved the Best Picture Oscar we will discover when I come to the end of the 1950s but this is a film that looks stunning and has a great slapstick performance from Cantinflas even if it is far too long and has too many unnecessary elements to it I feel that certain elements will stick in my mind long after I have watched the film something that can't be said about King Solomon's Mines. So out of these two films I would say that Around the World in 80 Days is definitely the superior of the two but I don't think that's a particularly hard battle to win.
Thursday, 1 March 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 153-154: Musical Madness
As we've seen in the 1950s thus far that the rise of Technicolor and cinemascope meant that a lot of big epics were being made as they now looked spectacular on the screen. Another genre that saw a rise was that of the musical and two big named musicals were nominated for the Best Picture Oscar in 1955 and 1957 respectively. First up is Seven Brides for Seven Brothers a jolly musical film that features plenty of physical violence and the multiple abduction of women by the roguish brothers of the title. It kicks off with Howard Keel's Adam journeying from his mountaintop farm to find himself a wife a task he carries off with ease hooking up with the innocent Millie and taking her back to his house to live with his six brothers. Millie tries to hammer some civility into these boys and it works for a while as she gets them clean and learning proper courtship rituals but when they are provoked at a barn raising contest they lose their temper and get into a fight losing their girls in the process. Adam convinces his brothers to go and kidnap the women and indeed the townsfolk can't rescue them after an avalanche meaning that the girls and Millie end up taking the house banishing the brothers to the stables. However as is often the case the girls soften as the snow begins to thaw and as the title would suggest there is a mass wedding ceremony to end the film. Obviously as you can tell I really wasn't taken with the brutish nature of this film nor did I think that Millie did a particularly good job civilising the men or keeping the women from them. What I did like however were the songs and also the use of Technicolor in particular the pastel colours that the men wore and how they interlinked with the dresses that their intendeds were also wearing. The songs, of which Bless Your Beautiful Hide is the most famous, are also fairly catchy and there are some great little set pieces including the aforementioned barn-raising however as a film I didn't think it was particularly well constructed and I didn't warm to any of the characters.
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 152: Sidney, Tony, Jenny and Bill
Part two of the catch-up with one film I remember and one that really hasn't stuck with me at all.
The film I can't really remember is Love is a Many Splendored Thing which stars Jennifer Jones and William Holden. As you can probably imagine from the title this is a romantic drama set in Hong Kong in the 1940s with Jones playing it borderline racist as Han a Eurasian doctor who falls in love with Holden's reporter Mark a man who was previously married but is now separated. The two enjoy a love affair which is later tarnished by racial barriers as Han is ostracised by her Chinese community for falling in love with an American which is further complicated by the fact he was previously married. I don't want to give the plot away after that for those of you who may want to watch it but for me this was a predictable melodrama that somehow was nominated for eight awards and stopped classics like To Catch a Thief, Guys and Dolls and Rebel Without a Cause from getting a nomination. The only thing really memorable about this film is its award winning title tune and that's about it both Jones and Holden have been in better films and both should've known better.
Finally a film that I did enjoy with two Oscar nominated Best Actor performances for both Tony Curtis and Sidney Poitier in The Defiant Ones. Curtis and Poitier play John and Noah respectively who are two criminals that escape from a chain gang and are stuck with each other despite their mutual loathing. As you could imagine from a film released in the late 1950s race comes into play as John has a hatred of Noah based on the colour of his skin while Noah hates John's prejudice towards him. Though over time they learn a little bit about each other and despite their differences they learn to get along for the hope of actually escaping from their lives as prisoners. The final third of the film sees them happen upon a young boy and his mother a lonely housewife who falls for John and wants to escape with him leaving Noah behind to fend for himself. But by this point in the film the two have formed an unbreakable bond and John has to make his mind up whether to be free or stick with his newfound friend. I really enjoyed The Defiant Ones, which was a film I wasn't familiar with before I watched it, as it is a tense cops and robbers film with the camera also following the police's attempts to apprehend the two escapees. In his first starring role Poitier really goes for it and becomes a star while Curtis is also brilliant in a role which shows off his gritty demeanour. The fact that this lost to the very twee Gigi just shows how wrong Oscar gets a lot of the time but I will now be listing this as one of my favourite films I've watched so far which I'm sure is some consolation to those involved, or perhaps not.
The film I can't really remember is Love is a Many Splendored Thing which stars Jennifer Jones and William Holden. As you can probably imagine from the title this is a romantic drama set in Hong Kong in the 1940s with Jones playing it borderline racist as Han a Eurasian doctor who falls in love with Holden's reporter Mark a man who was previously married but is now separated. The two enjoy a love affair which is later tarnished by racial barriers as Han is ostracised by her Chinese community for falling in love with an American which is further complicated by the fact he was previously married. I don't want to give the plot away after that for those of you who may want to watch it but for me this was a predictable melodrama that somehow was nominated for eight awards and stopped classics like To Catch a Thief, Guys and Dolls and Rebel Without a Cause from getting a nomination. The only thing really memorable about this film is its award winning title tune and that's about it both Jones and Holden have been in better films and both should've known better.
Finally a film that I did enjoy with two Oscar nominated Best Actor performances for both Tony Curtis and Sidney Poitier in The Defiant Ones. Curtis and Poitier play John and Noah respectively who are two criminals that escape from a chain gang and are stuck with each other despite their mutual loathing. As you could imagine from a film released in the late 1950s race comes into play as John has a hatred of Noah based on the colour of his skin while Noah hates John's prejudice towards him. Though over time they learn a little bit about each other and despite their differences they learn to get along for the hope of actually escaping from their lives as prisoners. The final third of the film sees them happen upon a young boy and his mother a lonely housewife who falls for John and wants to escape with him leaving Noah behind to fend for himself. But by this point in the film the two have formed an unbreakable bond and John has to make his mind up whether to be free or stick with his newfound friend. I really enjoyed The Defiant Ones, which was a film I wasn't familiar with before I watched it, as it is a tense cops and robbers film with the camera also following the police's attempts to apprehend the two escapees. In his first starring role Poitier really goes for it and becomes a star while Curtis is also brilliant in a role which shows off his gritty demeanour. The fact that this lost to the very twee Gigi just shows how wrong Oscar gets a lot of the time but I will now be listing this as one of my favourite films I've watched so far which I'm sure is some consolation to those involved, or perhaps not.
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 151: All About Bette
So I'm in catch-up mode with three films that I watched last year but haven't yet reviewed so will start off with the absolute classic that has stayed with me long after I finished watching it.
I'm talking of course of All About Eve a glorious film and a classic which I ashamedly
hadn't watched previously. It did win the Best Picture award in 1951 but
shockingly only one acting award for George Sanders' memorable
performance as the bitchy journalist. The film starts with Bette Davis'
Margo Channing and Celeste Holm's Karen Richards both reminiscing about
the first time they met Anne Baxter's Eve Harrington as she wins an
award for her acting. Karen, the wife of a scriptwriter, introduces Eve
to star actress Margo who eventually hires her as an assistant despite
suspicions from her current helper Birdie played with vigour by the
brilliant Thelma Ritter. As the film goes on Eve plants herself into
Margo's life more with the actress now becoming paranoid it seems that
Eve has now become Margo's understudy later garnering rave reviews after
intentionally making Margo late for a performance. Eve then starts
flirting with Sanders' Addison who thinks he's figured out but then she
starts lying to him about an affair she is having with Karen's wife
Lloyd. Addison finally unravels Eve's backstory and then the whole thing
finally comes full circle when a girl like Eve comes to her doorstep
claiming admiration for her. Everything is right about All About Eve
which is evident from its fourteen nominations and only six wins. It's
always obvious to wax lyrical about Baxter or Davis but for me it's
Celeste Holm who holds everything together by not playing a person who
is part of the showbiz set and who is genuinely taken with the young
innocent Eve. This is a film that demonstrates the perils of fame and
what some people will do to get ahead but is presented in a way that
never alienates the audience by in the end letting the characters get
their just deserts. Overall a brilliant film that deserves all the
accolades it picked up at the 1951 ceremony.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)