Showing posts with label Charles Bickford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Bickford. Show all posts

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 118: Nothing to Do With the Four Tops

Over the past couple of weeks in the Oscar Challenge we've had a bit of a religious theme whether it be Bing Crosby's priest visiting a school run by nuns or David Niven's Bishop clashing with Cary Grant's Angel it's all been getting a bit too holy. So I was disheartened to learn that The Song of Bernadette was nothing to do with the 1967 Four Tops hit Bernadette, a bit impossible seeing that the film was nominated for Best Picture at the 1944 ceremony. The star Jennifer Jones also was one of the first to discover that if you play a character with an illness, firstly asthma and later cancer, your chance to win an Oscar is greatly increased. Jones' Bernadette is a young innocent who while gathering logs in a cave in Lourdes ends up seeing a vision of the Virgin Mary. Obviously most people don't believe her, her parents are embarrassed and want her to stop and the officials in Lourdes think that her supposed visions are doing adverse things for the town. The Town Officials are all seen as devious men as they all have ominous facial hair and are played by classical actors like Lee J Cobb and most notably a campy Vincent Price seemingly in a different film from everyone else. Eventually people start to believe her when a spring that Bernadette digs produces water that heals the residents and when the emperor uses it Bernadette is appeased. Her former headmaster suggests that she joins a convent where she comes face to face with her old teacher Sister Vazous who is jealous of Bernadette and wonders why the visions are coming to a girl who doesn't deserve rather than someone like her who has prayed and devote all her life. She feels shame when Bernadette is diagnosed and later dies from cancer of course after her death she was sainted and now everyone talks about the healing qualities of Lourdes.

If The Song of Bernadette were released today it would be seen as a traditional Oscar film. Featuring themes of faith vs. religion, a lead character who is a bit dopey and then suffers from cancer and various Americans pretending to be French and of course a true story this has everything that the Academy loves. But in the less cynical 1940s I think they might just have been taken with the sweet nature of the film and Jones' naive performance as Bernadette which won her the Oscar. To be fair Jones is good as the lead having to go from playing a 14 year old school girl to Bernadette at her death she is able to demonstrate her range. Elsewhere I think Gladys Cooper possibly deserved a Supporting Actress Oscar as Sister Vazous the angry nun who shows humanistic qualities also nominated for Oscars were Charles Bickford as her headmaster priest and Anne Revere as her mother although I just loved Price's town prosecutor maybe because he was so over-the-top. For me it was a little bit too long after a while I got the point that people didn't believe Bernadette and thought the second half of her life was rushed in comparison. The general tone of the thing was very much pro-religion presenting all the non-believers as comical villains and giving them no leeway whatsoever basically saying if you don't believe in God, then you're wrong. So if you can overcome this strong message then you might be able to enjoy some of the performances in the film but personally I'd just stick on the best of The Four Tops album on instead.

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 107: Not Watching this for my GCSE Coursework

So if you've been following this haphazard adventure up to this point you do know that I have being using a YouTube channel to watch some of these films and one of my guilty pleasures is reading the comments that others have left under the video. Before starting the viewing of the latest film, the adaptation of Of Mice and Men that was nominated at the 1940 ceremony, I read the comments most of them seemed to be from teenagers copping out from reading the book and watching this movie instead but from what I could garner this adaptation was rather tame and left out some of the more risqué elements of the text. I have to say I have heard of the book and was aware of some elements of the plot but have never seen the story told in any form up to this point. For those of you like me that aren't aware of the plot it sees two friends - the smart and quick-witted George and the somewhat slow and bulking Lenny, go to work on a ranch in Southwest California after being chased out of their previous town thanks to an incident involving Lenny (something that is never fully explained in the film but in the book he has been accused of rape after stroking a girl's hair). George keeps Lenny happy by reciting the story of the ranch that they're going to own together one day in which Lenny can keep an eye on their rabbits and this dream almost becomes a reality when fellow ranch hand  Candy agrees to pitch in some money to help with the project. However Lenny gets them in trouble once again first by punching the boss' son Curly and then for accidentally killing Curly's wife while trying to stroke her hair. I won't spoil the ending but it things don't end well for the twosome and lets just say their dream never quite becomes a reality.

Of Mice and Men is a strange one to review as in the back of my mind I can see it more as a text than a film even though I've never read it and maybe that's because I've been influenced by those YouTube commenters. The story really never sags and there is some good interplay between the ranch-hands with moments of joy juxtaposed with some really sad moments including one with Candy's dog. Of the acting Lon Chaney Jr. does a magnificent job with Lenny coming across a simple man who is picked upon because of his size and his lack of brain power. A pre-Batman pre-Rocky Burgess Meredith gives George a sympathetic edge and a very real quality to him as well and Betty Field as Curly's wife Mae plays the vampy bitch with an air of style. But this is very much a re-telling of a story, there isn't much to say in terms of camera-work or sets which are fairly basic. I wasn't particularly moved by the ending but still thought there was some solid storytelling within the film overall a decent literary adaptation but not really a film that left a major impression on me.