Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Days 199 and 200: All at Sea

So here we are, back again with another post featuring two films bound together by a common theme. This time I'm taking it to incredibly tenuous levels by focusing on two movies that are both set on boats. One is a remake of a previous Oscar winner, the other is a periodic drama focusing on a number of characters aboard a German ocean liner.

And we'll start with the latter film, Ship of Fools, which is based on a novel but feels like it's been adapted from a play. The film focuses on a plethora of characters aboard a liner that has departed from Mexico and is on the way to Germany. Several to camera monologues are performed by a dwarf named Glocken, who is regularly ostracised on the ship and spends his dinner times eating with the Jewish passengers. The majority of the film is seen through the eyes of the ship's Doctor Schumann, who is about depart the vessel as he has found out he is dying from a heart condition. Schumann is drawn to one of the latest passengers - a drug-addicted countessa from Spain who is bound for a Mexican jail. Schumann and La Contessa fall in love but both realise that their courtship cannot last. Aging divorcee Mary Treadwell is attempting to glam herself up but she discovers she isn't as young as she used to be, something former baseball player Bill Denny is also learning. Meanwhile younger couple Jenny and David are having issues as he feels like she doesn't appreciate his art and doesn't have as many ideas and beliefs as him. Finally we meet Rieber, a bigoted businessman who is a member of the Nazi Party and perfectly represents the feeling of some Germans in 1933.

I personally found Ship of Fools to be a mixed bag of stories, some that I liked more than others. I felt the relationship between Schumman and the countessa was perfectly played by Oskar Werner and Simone Signoret. This sort of tragic love story was at the heart of the film and I would've preferred to have seen the film focus on just that. Vivien Leigh, in her final film role, is brilliant as Mary a former beauty who is losing her looks, and I really liked the scene in which she put on make-up in front of the mirror while talking to herself. But I found other stories to be less engaging especially the one focusing on Jose Ferrer's Rieber and his ostracising of several of his fellow passengers. One of the better performances from me came from Michael Dunn who, as Glocken, has to narrate the story straight to the audience. The film certainly looked impressive, with the flamenco scene in particular catching my eye, but there's only so much you can do with a film set almost completely on a boat. Given the cast, I would've thought that Ship of Fools could've been better but there was just far too much going on. While I'm not surprised that it received a ton of Oscar nominations, I didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I also found myself comparing it to previous Best Picture Winner Grand Hotel which this bore more than a striking resemblance to.

Talking of Best Picture winners from the 1930s, we have our first remake of one in the form of Mutiny on the Bounty. This version, director by Lewis Milestone, sees Captain Bligh and Fletcher Christian return but this time both characters seem slightly different. The story is the same, namely that a crew of men set off to Tahiti but on the way their Captain starts to act in a tyrannical fashion. As Captain Bligh wants to keep the water rations low, he starts to deprive his men of their basic rations and raises the ire of Fletcher. But in this version of Mutiny on the Bounty, Fletcher is presented as more of a fop who is influence into mutiny by his fellow shipmates. One seaman in particular, Mills, gets in Fletcher's ear and provokes him into fighting against his captain. One other big change is that Fletcher ultimately regrets his decision and tries to return to England but his plans our sabotaged by other mutineers. This version of the story also introduced a narrator in the form of horticulturist William Brown whose job it was to identify the breadfruit plants when the crew got to Tahiti. However, I didn't believe Brown would've been part of the mutiny and felt the only reason for his betrayal was so that he could recall the story on camera.

I personally wasn't much of a fan of this version of Mutiny on the Bounty than I was of the Oscar-winning 1935 original. Part of the reason for that is that a lot of the performances lacked the passion that was present in the previous cast. A case in point is Trevor Howard, who played Bligh, as he is a lot less menacing and therefore comes across as less of a brute than Charles Laughton. Indeed, Bligh was fairly friendly at times and most of his dastardly acts were at least explainable to an extent. I get the feeling that Fletcher Christian's change of character was due to the fact that Marlon Brando played him. Brando, who allegedly held up the production, obviously wanted to play more of a hero so in this version Fletcher literally goes down in flames. I fact I found the most compelling member of the cast to be Richard Harris as idealistic Seaman Mills. At almost three hours, the film is way too long and I honestly didn't really get into it until the second act. The film really gets going during and after the mutiny with all the cast excelling in their various roles. There's no denying that this version of Mutiny on the Bounty is more visually spectacular than its original but other than that there's nothing new here. I especially wasn't a fan of Brando here, and I feel that he's lost something since I last saw him in On the Waterfront and Sayonara.

Next time we continue on the sea - this time with Steve McQueen.

Matt's Big Oscar Challenge Day 142: One Final Bogey

As I've gone through the decades so far I've seen a lot of film stars of the classic era - Grant, Gable, Davis, Katharine Hepburn, Fred and Ginger and of course Humphrey Bogart. As far as this Oscar Challenge goes we first saw Bogey back in the 1930s as a gangster in Dead End. From there we've seen him as private detective, treasure hunter and most notably the tortured Rick in Casablanca. However we don't get to see his only Oscar win for The African Queen as that didn't receive a Best Picture nomination instead Bogart's journey ends at the 1955 ceremony with his final Oscar nomination as Commander Queeg in The Caine Mutiny. The film revolves around the Caine a minesweeper-destroyer which is seen as a bit of a battered ship and not the first option for most sailors on board. Joining the crew is Ensign Willie Keith who soon strikes up a bond with would-be novelist Tom Keefer as well as ingratiating himself with the other crew members including Captain DeVriess and Lt. Maryk.DeVriess is soon replaced by Queeg who is a very regimental sort and is compared to Mutiny on the Bounty's Captain Bligh by Keefer. Keefer suggests to Maryk and Keith that Queeg is a little bit insane although Maryk refuses to report this until he has more proof so starts keeping a journal of Queeg's poor decisions. This eventual leads to Maryk taking over from Queeg on one mission a decision that is seconded by Keith and after this they are both arrested for mutiny. Lawyer Lt. Barney Greenwald reluctantly takes the case without ever agreeing with the decision made by the men but wins the case after proving Queeg is a man with paranoia however during the case Keefer doesn't stick up for his former colleagues denying the fact that he thought Queeg was insane. In the end Greenwald confronts Keefer saying that he planted  mutinous thoughts in the heads of the other officers and Keith heads off for service on a new boat once again captained by DeVriess.

I very much enjoyed The Caine Mutiny mainly because your perceptions of the characters are changed at every turn. Like Maryk and Keith I went along with Keefer's thoughts about Queeg being insane but forgot about him opening up to his officers after a poor decision. Barney's confrontation of the three men at the end of the film is one of its best scenes and he reminds them that Queeg is a military man through and through and deserves respect he ends the film not as a Bligh-esque monster but more a tragic figure driven mad through years of service. Queeg's humane side is a testament to the character that Humphrey Bogart gives to him and I think he could've easily have on a second Best Actor Oscar had he not been challenged by Marlon Brando's terrific turn in On the Waterfront. Indeed the film suffered from being up against On The Waterfront particularly when it came to the Supporting Actors in the film as Waterfront took three spots in the supporting category and Caine's only entry into that category was surprisingly Tom Tully as DeVriess who exits the film very early and didn't leave an impression on me. If I had had to put someone forward it would probably have been Van Johnson as Maryk a man who always wanted to do the right thing but took the wrong course of action after being manipulated by Keefer. Jose Ferrer as Barney was also great as the man who wanted to win a case he didn't particularly believe in and even Fred McMurray's Keefer is a good complex character. But it was Robert Francis' performance as Willie Keith which anchors the film, pardon the pun, in only his second film tragically this would be his last as Francis was being groomed for stardom but perished in an aircraft accident. The Caine Mutiny also has a great love for its naval roots being backed by the U.S. Navy the scenes aboard the ship and in its many cabins are shot perfectly and some of the minor cast, including bizarrely Lee Marvin, were cast due to their naval background.

All in all a great film which in any other year would've won Best Picture but as I said before it had the unlucky fortune of coming up against the juggernaut that was On the Waterfront. And a small battered ship like The Caine never had a chance against a Juggernaut like that.