After two Shakespearian adaptations failing to win the Oscars in the
1930s, the final winner at a 1940's Oscar Ceremony was indeed based on
one of Will's best loved works. And it was by one of the men who would
become famous for his Shakespearian leads that being Laurence Olivier
who also won as Best Lead Actor
and produced and directed the piece. Unlike a lot of the other films
I'm not providing a plot synopsis here because most of you should know
the story of Hamlet i.e. Danish prince tries to avenge the death of his
father by his uncle, who then married his mother, by trying to get him
to admit to the crime and then killing him himself. Obviously this being
a tragedy the lion's share of the characters die one way or another,
Hamlet's love Ophelia goes a bit potty and drowns herself, Hamlet's mum
is poisoned and my favourite is Polonius who is stabbed while behind a
curtain giving us the message that Peeping Toms never prosper. But
adaptations of Shakespeare's plays should always be analysed by how they
look visually. To some extent Olivier has done a good job the scene in
which Hamlet writes a play basically about his uncle killing his father
is done very well, with the space used for the play being particularly
apt. The way this whole scene is lit is brilliant and some colour almost
creeps into the scene also. The way that Hamlet's father's ghost is
portrayed is also done very well with a suit of armour with a blacked
out face surrounded by smoke creating a sense of fear. The filmic
techniques also allow for some of the dialogue to be changed with Hamlet
delivering some of his soliloquies in voice-over. On the whole though I
did find the film was overly stagey and Olivier didn't quite utilise
all that was available to him in terms of filmic space. As there was so
much opportunity to do something special I feel it was squandered and
most of the scenes felt like they were simply being acted on the stage. I
know it's an adaptation but Olivier failed to make edits and almost 2
and a half hours it feels too long.
Another problem I had was in
Olivier's lead performance, although there's no denying he's one of the
greatest actors of all time, I just feel that he was maybe a little too
old for Hamlet and he failed to portray some of his vulnerability
instead going for all out thespian-mode. The other nominated member of
the cast, Jean Simmons as Ophelia, also didn't do a lot for me and I was
rather glad when she drowned herself. There were some good supporting
performances mainly from Basil Sydney as Claudius, Eileen Herlie as
Gertrude and Felix Alymer as Polonius. At the end of the day I think
the academy wanted to seem a little cultured that year and that's maybe
why Olivier's Hamlet won the big one. I'm not saying it's a bad film but
for me Olivier failed to make a film instead this felt more like a
filmed version of a Hamlet performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment